Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 24, 2025, 2:50 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wft?!? a mash banger Brit sawed of a 'merican's head!
RE: Wft?!? a mash banger Brit sawed of a 'merican's head!
(August 22, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I'm not blurring anything at all, but you do seem awfully ignorant. It's as if you haven't heard of the "divine right" theory that kings of that era used to buttress their rule. Which sort of god, Catholic or Protestant, they gained their authority from mattered much to the folks that they would rule. That necessarily blurred the lines between Church and State, which is exactly what I was saying: the Europeans learnt that letting religion interfere with all aspects of life was a damned dangerous thing. So I must suggest that you, yourself, do a little reading, at least enough to equip yourself for this conversation, because you clearly don't know your ass from third base about this little bit of history.
very good, now finish your thoughts, and drag them to their logical conclusion when you apply your tid bit of history to what is being discussed.

If there is no seperation between church and state and said state (such as the Holy Roman Empire) declares war in the name of God does it mean God is somehow locked in and bound to support them, especially when the declaration of war counter mands the mandates given to us as Christians in the bible?

No. Especially when you look at the theology surrounding the Holy Roman Empire. At that time the pope was considered a living apstole with the power rights and ability to invent and countermand scripture. Which is what had to be done to declare war on prodestant states.

So again, actions taken in the name of God not supported by the bible are not apart of the Biblical Christianity Christ established and supports. This is what our media would deem 'radical christianity."

Quote:Also, when you do that reading (if you ever bother getting around to it, I'm sure your Bible holds sway in your "education"), you should perhaps focus on reading comprehension, because you seem to have an issue with it; I never said that that war was fought because of a scriptural command, for instance; yet you're acting as if that's what you read. I'll be happy to give you English lessons, but I do think that you'd be less embarrassed if we did that in private.
ROFLOLROFLOL that was so arrogant and pompous it gave my irony meter cancer!ROFLOL good job! I will get to have some fun with this next bit.

The reason we are talking about biblical commands is because I introduced this subject like on page three the very first time this angle of attack came up. And I have been talking about it ever since. There has been at least 4 maybe 5 of you guys in an effort to shut me up has brought up this very to my attention.. Note your the only one still talking about it. Why? Because they all understand and have acknowledged through their silence that that Christianity per the scriptures (Christian not OT Jewish)is a nonviolent religion. ROFLOLappearently reading comprehension is where we both fail. Maybe get your lesson ready set your computer in front of a mirror and just pretend your talking to me, but at the same time take notes..Wink

Quote:Another thing: you must have the advantage of height in order to be condescending. Not that you'd know that.
That is why my efforts are on being focused on being arrogant, contemptuous, or sarcastic.
ROFLOL

(August 22, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I'm not blurring anything at all, but you do seem awfully ignorant. It's as if you haven't heard of the "divine right" theory that kings of that era used to buttress their rule. Which sort of god, Catholic or Protestant, they gained their authority from mattered much to the folks that they would rule. That necessarily blurred the lines between Church and State, which is exactly what I was saying: the Europeans learnt that letting religion interfere with all aspects of life was a damned dangerous thing. So I must suggest that you, yourself, do a little reading, at least enough to equip yourself for this conversation, because you clearly don't know your ass from third base about this little bit of history.
very good, now finish your thoughts, and drag them to their logical conclusion when you apply your tid bit of history to what is being discussed.

If there is no seperation between church and state and said state (such as the Holy Roman Empire) declares war in the name of God does it mean God is somehow locked in and bound to support them, especially when the declaration of war counter mands the mandates given to us as Christians in the bible?

No. Especially when you look at the theology surrounding the Holy Roman Empire. At that time the pope was considered a living apstole with the power rights and ability to invent and countermand scripture. Which is what had to be done to declare war on prodestant states.

So again, actions taken in the name of God not supported by the bible are not apart of the Biblical Christianity Christ established and supports. This is what our media would deem 'radical christianity."

Quote:Also, when you do that reading (if you ever bother getting around to it, I'm sure your Bible holds sway in your "education"), you should perhaps focus on reading comprehension, because you seem to have an issue with it; I never said that that war was fought because of a scriptural command, for instance; yet you're acting as if that's what you read. I'll be happy to give you English lessons, but I do think that you'd be less embarrassed if we did that in private.
ROFLOLROFLOL that was so arrogant and pompous it gave my irony meter cancer!ROFLOL good job! I will get to have some fun with this next bit.

The reason we are talking about biblical commands is because I introduced this subject like on page three the very first time this angle of attack came up. And I have been talking about it ever since. There has been at least 4 maybe 5 of you guys in an effort to shut me up has brought up this very to my attention.. Note your the only one still talking about it. Why? Because they all understand and have acknowledged through their silence that that Christianity per the scriptures (Christian not OT Jewish)is a nonviolent religion. ROFLOLappearently reading comprehension is where we both fail. Maybe get your lesson ready set your computer in front of a mirror and just pretend your talking to me, but at the same time take notes..Wink

Quote:Another thing: you must have the advantage of height in order to be condescending. Not that you'd know that.
That is why my efforts are on being focused on being arrogant, contemptuous, or sarcastic.
ROFLOL

(August 22, 2014 at 6:48 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(August 22, 2014 at 6:28 pm)Drich Wrote: .... Well I'm not confused.

Nominated for the Dwarf-Star-Alloy Grade Irony Award.

Also you owe me a new smartphone. I just choked vodka over it.

Ahhh, doct-orb who I presume?
I may not be confused, but I don't get what you see in the doctor.

(August 22, 2014 at 6:59 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Drich: are you a typical Yank burg-cheeser? Or a dog-hotter? Can you see how childish you sound with your contrived racial slurs? They add nothing to whatever argument you're trying to make but instead show you up as an ill-educated wanker. If that's what you're going for then fine, but I'm asking you, politely, to please knock it off. This is not an official sanction, merely a request from one member to another.

Alright alright, all you had to do was ask. No need to be offensive. I have been call a b*rg-cheeser since we tried to burn those korans.
Wink

If you need to change the title of my thread feel free to do so..

Wow b*rg-cheeser, I had no idea you'd felt the need to go there.
Tongue
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Wft?!? a mash banger Brit sawed of a 'merican's head! - by Drich - August 22, 2014 at 7:15 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Current Head of WHO plays the "Race Card." Can you guess if he's black looking? Duty 9 1433 April 14, 2022 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  A Fy on the Head Secular Elf 11 1260 October 10, 2020 at 3:18 pm
Last Post: Brian37
Thumbs Up Washtenaw Deputy punches woman protestor in head onlinebiker 39 6007 June 5, 2020 at 2:22 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  NFL Team Considering Former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for Head Coach Seraphina 10 2154 November 18, 2018 at 9:56 pm
Last Post: CarveTheFive
  A non-scientist has been appointed head of NASA. c172 7 1525 April 23, 2018 at 10:58 pm
Last Post: Cecelia
  trump puts head of Breitbart on national security council Anomalocaris 20 4951 January 31, 2017 at 3:59 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  "Not the right time" rears it's ugly head again. Brian37 21 5706 April 11, 2016 at 7:07 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Head of Atheist org's home vandalized in Israel account_inactive 13 2532 January 26, 2016 at 1:46 am
Last Post: account_inactive
  Trapper from MASH dies. Brian37 25 5403 January 14, 2016 at 12:59 am
Last Post: KevinM1
  Saudi 'chosen to head key UN human rights panel' ReptilianPeon 15 2360 September 23, 2015 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Regina



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)