RE: Wft?!? a mash banger Brit sawed of a 'merican's head!
August 22, 2014 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: August 22, 2014 at 7:32 pm by Drich.)
(August 22, 2014 at 7:02 pm)Insanity Wrote:(August 22, 2014 at 6:52 pm)Drich Wrote: Look at it like a formula. If the beheading is the net result (can't do anything about that) then the only variable becomes the executioner. Granted from the video this guy was not the typical Brit mash banger (not paste-y white) he is someone who with the right paper work could indeed be anywhere (meaning in direct service or access to launch codes or something worse.) in your country or mine.
That's true of anyone with extreme views of just about anything in any nation with missiles..
That's just it. They don't have any. But with a guy who can blend in to soceity, they have access to something as trivial as the fry station at mcDonalds, to the power grid, to command codes.
That is why it is so unsettling that a (fill in a suitable PC racial slurr for stimbo's people) cut dudes head off and not one of baghdadi's people.
(August 22, 2014 at 7:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Drippy, we know you're a shithead. You don't have to keep proving it.
Quote:Origins of the War
The Peace of Augsburg (1555), signed by Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, confirmed the result of the 1526 Diet of Speyer, ending the war between German Lutherans and Catholics, and establishing that:[15]
Rulers of the 224 German states could choose the religion (Lutheranism or Catholicism) of their realms according to their consciences, and compel their subjects to follow that faith (the principle of cuius regio, eius religio).
Lutherans living in a prince-bishopric (a state ruled by a Catholic bishop) could continue to practice their faith.
Lutherans could keep the territory they had captured from the Catholic Church since the Peace of Passau in 1552.
Those prince-bishops who had converted to Lutheranism were required to give up their territories (the principle called reservatum ecclesiasticum).
Although the Peace of Augsburg created a temporary end to hostilities, it did not resolve the underlying religious conflict, which was made yet more complex by the spread of Calvinism throughout Germany in the years that followed.[16] This added a third major faith to the region, but its position was not recognized in any way by the Augsburg terms, to which only Catholicism and Lutheranism were parties.[17][18]
Quote:By 1617, it was apparent that Matthias, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Bohemia, would die without an heir, with his lands going to his nearest male relative, his cousin Archduke Ferdinand II of Austria, heir-apparent and Crown Prince of Bohemia. With the Oñate treaty, Philip III of Spain agreed to this succession.
Ferdinand, having been educated by the Jesuits, was a staunch Catholic who wanted to impose religious uniformity on his lands. This made him highly unpopular in Protestant (primarily Hussite) Bohemia. The population's sentiments notwithstanding, the added insult of the nobility's rejection of Ferdinand, who had been elected Bohemian Crown Prince in 1617, triggered the Thirty Years' War in 1618, when his representatives were thrown out of a window and seriously injured. The so-called Defenestration of Prague provoked open revolt in Bohemia, which had powerful foreign allies. Ferdinand was upset by this calculated insult, but his intolerant policies in his own lands had left him in a weak position. The Habsburg cause in the next few years would seem to suffer unrecoverable reverses. The Protestant cause seemed to wax toward a quick overall victory.
All you happy jesus freaks merrily slaughtering each other would be a wonder to behold. Why don't you start some shit and see if you can do it?
You do know I only answer one of six of your posts to me right? And if on that sixth one your message has already been addressed then I just start the clock over again.
Looks like I'm going to have the start the clock over again.