Should man rule over women for women’s own good?

[Greatest I am]

That explains you not knowing your duty.

Regards
DL

Your little happy family unit trope is not in alignment with reality. Before you go telling others what their duties are, perhaps you should first examine where you fit, in the scheme of things. And I mean in this world in this life, with real people who certainly are able to live quite well, without your garbage emotional baggage and blackmail. Duty to oneself, reign supreme. Or did you not know this?
My duty to myself encompasses all those interrelationship bonds, and don't need guidelines of heirarchy. For instance, your duty to yourself is to be happy healthy and content. To be happy, one must find balance with those they love.

Widows
Single parents
GLBT
Adoption

All of these are real life examples of.. REAL LIFE. You can't account for it because you at stuck in a little box, and cannot see how miniscule you really are in the grand scheme of things.

There are two men that I know, who have the same opinion as you do about womenly duties. They're utterly and completely alone, bitter and hateful individuals. They are so full of themselves, shit just flies everywhere out of their mouths and elsewhere.

For your sake, I hope you can get over the supremacy you have allocated yourself, so you may fully enjoy life, and the relationships therein.

As a woman, Esquilaxs woman to be exact-- I choose to whom I submit my entire being, mind body, and heart. I would rather die, than give myself to a pig who points to a book and tells me I'm his subservient.

Esquilax will receive every natural gift a woman has to offer, willingly, from me, because he earned it. Because he is a man deserving of eVerything that I can have the privelage of providing him. And thankfully he and I are progressive enough to recognize that both our viewpoints equally matter, so the resolution will be equally agreed upon. Sometimes I will submit to his best judgement, and he to mine, but no one Owns supreme position over the other.

Good for you. Independence is good.

" Duty to oneself, reign supreme. Or did you not know this? "

No I did not and do not agree with you at all. I do not even think you believe this B.S. Let's find out.

You and your child are in a sinking boat and there is only one helping hand and that hand can only save one and the death of the other is assured.

Will you take that hand or will you put your child's hand in it?

If you answer correctly and morally then you will recognize your statement above as B.S. and recant.

If not then shame on you and here is your Captain Coward Club hat.

Regards
DL

---

I will let your answer demonstrate the veracity of the statement if you make it.

Do you see women being stronger physically than men?

Sure some women will put some men to shame but we are talking the greater majority here.

Regards
DL

So basically what you're advocating is that might makes right. Doesn't matter about character, or leadership qualities, intellect, morality... none of that factors into your determination that men should be in charge at all? It's just that men can lift heavier stuff?

If I was being less charitable I would insinuate that you were saying men can control women through violence, there. However, I don't think you're being outright malevolent, merely that you haven't thought this through at all.

I am not advocating might makes right as clearly shown in what I said.

Your just not tuning in.

Who should serve whom?

Be you male or female, should the weak serve the strong or the strong serve the weak?

Who is biologically the strongest in the human species?

Regards
DL

---

Ok seriously. Who the heck is Captain Coward and what was his duty? And what is the law of the sea? I thought international waters don't have many laws...

Good lord child, try Google.

Regards
DL