RE: On naturalism and consciousness
August 30, 2014 at 11:10 am
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2014 at 11:10 am by Surgenator.)
(August 30, 2014 at 10:34 am)bennyboy Wrote:(August 30, 2014 at 10:20 am)Surgenator Wrote: My definitions do not use physical monist terms. My definitions apply to any world view; that is why I used them. They can be used by monist, dualist, and pluralist of all flavors. But it is you who has to define mind and reality using your idealist monism terminology. It's dishonest.Dishonest? Defining mind in terms of the experience of thinking is dishonest?
I'd rage against the insult if I wasn't already laughing.
![ROFLOL ROFLOL](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/roflol.gif)
The ignorances is strong in this one.