(August 31, 2014 at 1:32 am)popeyespappy Wrote: There were 68 papers dealing with climate change published in peer reviewed journals from 1965 through 1979. Seven of them predicted cooling. Another 19 were neutral on the future of the climate. 42 predicted the climate would warm. Most of the latter attributed anthropogenic CO2 as the main driving factor.
This is not a discussion about climate change; it's a discussion about evolution, evidence, and faith. But you make my point. A Creationist would ask why we should believe your so-called scientists when their so-called facts disagree with each other!
I keep saying it: Both the Creationists and we scientifically-oriented folks are mostly doing nothing but arguing from authority. We're just as human and biased as they are. We're never going to convince them any more than they're going to convince us.
