RE: On naturalism and consciousness
September 3, 2014 at 5:34 pm
(This post was last modified: September 3, 2014 at 5:36 pm by Mudhammam.)
(September 3, 2014 at 1:21 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I've been explaining why I equate them all this time......doesn't seem very arbitrary to me amigo. Interpreting signals from your eyes and then creating a "visual image" based upon that abstraction -is computing-.
It -is- data processing, even if there's "more" to it. That visual field -is- data -being- processed. Our eyes aren't windows, right?
Rhythm, on computational theory, are "things" and "thoughts" of the same "substance," say, pure experience, but the former "externally given" while the latter are simply "internal" in origin?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
