RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless
September 13, 2014 at 7:29 am
(This post was last modified: September 13, 2014 at 7:32 am by fr0d0.)
We can know a lot a about a designer from the design. Even if that designer was natural processes, our exploration of the source takes the same form.
I also think dismissals of id can be quite lazy. Personally I'm anti id. I think it'd be lazy to dismiss it out of hand.
The question of belief in God is a whole other subject outside of this one. There I fully depart from the id crowd in that line of reasoning.
I also think dismissals of id can be quite lazy. Personally I'm anti id. I think it'd be lazy to dismiss it out of hand.
The question of belief in God is a whole other subject outside of this one. There I fully depart from the id crowd in that line of reasoning.