RE: Christians. Could you be wrong?
September 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: September 17, 2014 at 2:07 pm by Chas.)
(September 17, 2014 at 1:48 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Since you have never observed "dark matter" you accept that it exists purely upon the credentials of the claimants, do you not?
So why should this be any different?
No, it's because of its observed gravitational effects.
(September 17, 2014 at 2:03 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 17, 2014 at 1:46 pm)Esquilax Wrote: And the only source of light you can possibly think of is magic?
Seeing how the photograph is in the archives of the Religious Department of the Smithsonian Institute, even they can see the significance.
Yes, its anthropological significance - not its truth value.
The religious collection is a subset of the anthropology department.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.