Christians. Could you be wrong?

[Mister Agenda]

The man has clearly preformed scientific experiment on the negative of the photograph, documented every procedure he used, and found that there had to be a light at that position to strike the negative, the only conclusion is the supernatural, because lights just don't hang over peoples heads normally.

The only conclusion is that there had to be a light in that position to strike the negative. What you speculate from there is on you, not science.

But I like the fact that when presented with scientific evidence, you refuse to acknowledge it.

I am convinced of what the evidence actually indicates: the photo was not retouched, therefore the negative was affected by light either over the person's head or anywhere between the film and over the person's head. Whether it was a reflection or a miracle I can't tell, but I know which is the more likely bet.