RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
September 18, 2014 at 10:28 pm
(This post was last modified: September 18, 2014 at 10:37 pm by snowtracks.)
(September 18, 2014 at 3:05 am)Esquilax Wrote:"avalanches have been brought up several times, and you've just acted like they haven't" ---- i remember you asking about landsides, but have no remembrances of avalanches. but that aside this is what i posted aug 18:(September 17, 2014 at 10:42 pm)snowtracks Wrote: we know that the random universe generator or whatever your ilk believes in didn't do it because beings have the potential capability to reflect back upon it, but it has no capability to reflect on us. the mind has an infinite order of magnitude greater than matter. matter cannot generate mind.
You just keep asserting, over and over, that effects cannot be greater than causes. But I've never seen you even attempt to demonstrate or justify that. I've seen you play games with definitions to try and fit everything into your baseless assertion, and I've also seen you ignore every example given that you couldn't do that for (avalanches have been brought up several times, and you've just acted like they haven't) but aside from dishonest wordplay and outright fingers-in-your-ears ignorance, you haven't justified the foundational premise of your claim to knowledge, here.
Why the fuck should any of us take it seriously, if you can't even approach a demonstration of accuracy?
Quote: has it ever been explained that science didn't exist before the creation? now we find out how God did it, and we call that process science.
Given that you don't understand extremely basic scientific ideas, like what a fucking scientific theory is, I don't think I'll be coming to you for information on what science is, thanks.
landslides - a popsicle stick slanted at a 45 degree angle in a sandbox would slide sand particle from the top to the bottom. even if 2 popsicle sticks were rigged together with sand sliding down, the cause would still be greater than the effect.
(September 17, 2014 at 10:49 pm)Beccs Wrote:who knew that atheists are an especially sensitive group?(September 17, 2014 at 10:42 pm)snowtracks Wrote: 'magic' connotes deception, 'then' that's the wrong word. we know that the random universe generator or whatever your ilk believes in didn't do it because beings have the potential capability to reflect back upon it, but it has no capability to reflect on us. the mind has an infinite order of magnitude greater than matter. matter cannot generate mind.
"your ilk"
Charming . . .
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.