Christians. Could you be wrong?

[Mister Agenda]

So the Bible isn't an eyewitness acount of the Bible yet scienctist are still willing to believe in a big bang that no one was around to observe.

What scientists have for the 'Big Bang' is way better than eyewitness testimony, which is notoriously unrealiable. They have physical evidence.

If eyewitness testimony contradicts physical evidence at a trial, do you know which one usually 'wins'? If an eyewitness says they saw the defendant speeding away in a particular car, and a mechanic testifies that the car couldn't possibly have been operational at the time; does the eyewitness evidence override the mechanic's testimony, or is it more reasonable to conclude that the witness was mistaken or lying?