RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
September 25, 2014 at 6:06 pm
(September 25, 2014 at 5:48 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: It is worthwhile to make a term change when anyone who comes in contact with the term for the first time mistakes it for something else.
Anyone encountering the term for the first time who is actually interested in the subject won't be put off by the nomenclature. I don't think scientists should be blamed for the misconceptions of laymen.
(September 25, 2014 at 5:48 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: That is why they should stick to making names from latin or other such languages which nobody understands.
You think that's the reason Latin and Greek are used by scientists? To create confusion?
(September 25, 2014 at 5:48 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: That way even if someone wants to misunderstand that term, they will at least have to look up the definition of that term.
They can still do that regardless of the language used.
(September 25, 2014 at 5:48 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: PS: Why would the kudos give someone a wrong impression? Thumbs up is always used a symbol of agreeing with someone, and it's not like we are using picture of boners.
I was being deliberately mischievous for the purpose of analogy. I apologise if I obscured my point (cue choruses of "that's what she said" in 3... 2... 1...)
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
