(September 29, 2014 at 5:47 am)Rogue Wrote: I am [b]NOT[/b] trying to prove the existence of Jesus. I am going by what has been recorded in the bible.
That's hugely problematic: none of the biblical authors ever even met Jesus, so you're just going off of copies of copies of stories apparently recounted to anonymous authors... Just going via the bible gives you nothing solid to work off of at all.
Incidentally, why would you start by saying you're not trying to prove the existence of Jesus, and then end by asserting that certain things about him are "history"? For the latter to be true you'd have to do the former, unless you're more interested in skipping out on the burden of proof while keeping your assertions intact.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!