RE: Evidence God Exists: Part II
June 26, 2010 at 4:07 am
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2010 at 4:08 am by tavarish.)
(June 26, 2010 at 3:49 am)tackattack Wrote: LOL, ok so the arguement presented for the self evidence of the universe originally left out demonstratability.
No it didn't.
I wrote:
The universe - meaning reality as demonstrated by our environment - is self evident.
(June 26, 2010 at 3:49 am)tackattack Wrote: Aside from a little uproar then, what you're actually demonstrating are the laws, axioms and fundamental characteristics of the universe, that lead to it's demonstratability not actually demonstrating the universe as a whole.
How is the demonstrability of universal laws and fundamental characteristics of the universe NOT actually demonstrating the universe?
If I demonstrate that the characteristics of an apple exist, am I not demonstrating that the apple exists?
Existence isn't an attribute - it's the thing to which attributes apply.
(June 26, 2010 at 3:49 am)tackattack Wrote: So something is self evident if it conforms to a universal definition amongst consenting individuals and it's attributes are demonstrable is that about it?
Not necessarily, but in this case, such an assessment would apply. I also assume you're talking about our perception of the universe and not the universe itself.
(June 25, 2010 at 2:52 am)tackattack Wrote: No he's not the basis, but the yardstick by which I measure mine.
OK.
Is whatever God says moral? or is God just commanding already moral actions?
My blog: The Usual Rhetoric