(October 8, 2014 at 12:04 am)snowtracks Wrote: wrong again. "no effect without a cause, and the effect is never greater than cause". now, go in the corner and repeat 100 times or till you understand. puddles is confused also.
So... now you're just rewording your refuted Cosmological Argument to bring it one step further back to hope we wouldn't notice? Usually, when creationists use that argument, they try to use it to get closer to proving God, not to step away from it. I guess I'll give you props for recognizing when your argument has been refuted and moving away from it, but you're still essentially making the same argument. I think you've managed to trick yourself into thinking otherwise...
![[Image: Tryhardertryagain_zps99d26e60.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i175.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fw139%2Frobbypants%2FTryhardertryagain_zps99d26e60.jpg)