Abortion not allowed

[Mister Agenda]

I have given so many definations of what a human is stop asking for them.

No you bloody well haven't, again you are just lying. Now give us your definition of what a human is.

This is how I want it, I want you to write it like this:

I think a human is: _________
Or
The definition of a human is:________

I think the term 'human' confuses him because it can be an adjective. Maybe we should go with 'person'.

---

They were relevent at the time.

I'm afraid they weren't. Only a minority of acts of intercourse result in pregnancy, rape or not. We're not talking about the the majority of women who do not get pregnant when they are raped (though it's a worthy topic in other contexts). We're talking about the ones who DO get pregnant.

---

I never knew that so many people were eager to kill their unborn child.

Though if you actually HAVE had a majority of people here swear at you, it would be no wonder with comments like this.

---

His position that a fertilised egg is a human is quite solidly grounded. That is the consensus amongst scientists too. Is the beginning of the human life cycle quite apart from the rest of the process inside and outside of the mother's womb. So it's not only rational, but publicly accepted by medical professionals.

Yes, we all agree that it's human and alive. We were talking to a teenage boy and I was willing to give him some slack on being confused in thinking what's being asked is what makes something living human tissue. You're old enough to know that what we want to know is what he thinks makes something a human being, a person.

On the other hand, esq has argued vociferously that God would be acting immorally in talking the lives of babies. It's an amusing double standard. And serves to show the weakness with which he regards his own argument.

If Esquire had argued that God is wrong for taking the lives of fetuses, you might have a point. I'm pretty sure he was talking about taking the lives of human infants. Wrong for humans to do, wrong for God to do. What double standard?

If murder is the illegal taking of life, then most abortions aren't murder in the eyes of the the law. The morality of the act can always be considered, no matter what the legal position, and that's mostly a decision owned by the patents, being the only ones in a position to know.

Agreed.

---

It's not a fact, she is mistaken.

There's actually a bit in the early version about not assisting in abortions.