Blee, what archeological evidence have you that supports the bible being accurate?
If the bible was historically accurate, I would be even more suspicious of its writings, as preservation of and faithfulness to past events wasn't a widely utilized concept in the purported times. It's inaccuracy is more consistent with what you'd expect from a document or documents meant to manipulate large masses to act under a unified cause, rather than merely report on recent history without a hint of motive.
If the bible was historically accurate, I would be even more suspicious of its writings, as preservation of and faithfulness to past events wasn't a widely utilized concept in the purported times. It's inaccuracy is more consistent with what you'd expect from a document or documents meant to manipulate large masses to act under a unified cause, rather than merely report on recent history without a hint of motive.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
