RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 1, 2014 at 11:54 am
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2014 at 11:58 am by Anomalocaris.)
1. If you believe in God, you are not open minded.
" I hope that we can all agree that evolution and adaptation do exist in nature. All living creatures (animals and plants alike) can adapt to conditions over time. My argument is that Darwin's theory of evolution cannot be true because there has never been scientific proof of any one species adapting over time to be categorized as another species. Bacteria evolves into bacteria, fish evolve into fish, primates evolve into primates, etc. "
The factual assertions therein are bullshit. But even if it weren't, you reasoning is still total and elementary bullshit. You proceed upon a false promise and uses reasoning so flawed it would be trivial for an junior high student to pinpoint.
You have all basis covered just so you can justify believing in God.
Open minded indeed.
" I hope that we can all agree that evolution and adaptation do exist in nature. All living creatures (animals and plants alike) can adapt to conditions over time. My argument is that Darwin's theory of evolution cannot be true because there has never been scientific proof of any one species adapting over time to be categorized as another species. Bacteria evolves into bacteria, fish evolve into fish, primates evolve into primates, etc. "
The factual assertions therein are bullshit. But even if it weren't, you reasoning is still total and elementary bullshit. You proceed upon a false promise and uses reasoning so flawed it would be trivial for an junior high student to pinpoint.
You have all basis covered just so you can justify believing in God.
Open minded indeed.
