you know i made a really good observation

[Huggy Bear]

Right, so you are already aware, you have had this conversation before. I'm sorry if you're dissatisfied with being unable to control the flow of conversation with me. Them's the breaks.

You mean have I had a situation where an atheist refused to answer a simple question because the answer destroys their argument? yes.

Answer a simple yes or no question.

If you find new data that is more accurate, do you continue using the old data?

That's not a relevant question. We're not talking about a single point of data. We're talking about a data range. The old data isn't wrong, it's not as accurate.

Seeing as how I don't need to explain to you why a true scotsman doesn't rise to the level of an "argument" - I have to ask.......why did you feel compelled to put it out there? Where you hoping that maybe, this time, it might slip by? Should we (as the denizens of these boards) be insulted that your estimation of our intelligence and attentiveness is so low, or is there some other explanation?

It seems you don't even know your own atheist talking points.

You can't pull out the "no true scotsman" nonsense here because I'm not claiming "no true scotsman", my argument is "never was a scotsman". Is there a reason to be confused by a vegetarian eating a steak? nope, because he is obviously not a vegetarian.

So by not answering my question you leave no choice but to answer for you, the answer is obvious.

By definition a pacifist CANNOT be a mass murderer

The suffix "ian" means "to be like", so the word Christian means "to be like Christ" so by definition a person that does not follow the example of Christ and keep his commandments, is not a Christian (this includes mass murderers).