RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 12:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2014 at 12:18 pm by Heywood.)
(November 3, 2014 at 11:58 am)Stimbo Wrote: I don't think the conservation of momentum means what you think it does, especially if you think it's relevant to the topic of abiogenesis. When herring is on the menu, we're pretty much done. Time to tip the waiter and call a taxi.
Conservation of momentum was introduced to show that a claim you made is bullocks. If you agree that the claim you made is bullocks....we can move back to the topic of this thread....which is evolution and not abiogenesis.
You don't need abiogenesis to be true for evolution to be true. Abiogenesis is the real red herring here.
