RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 12:52 pm
(November 3, 2014 at 11:41 am)Heywood Wrote:(November 3, 2014 at 11:34 am)Stimbo Wrote: Of course not, but it does show that a god isn't a requirement for it to happen.
Negative.
For it to happen you have to have unchanging Laws of Nature. Laws of Nature are about something other than themselves. The law of conservation of momentum is about conserving momentum and not about conserving itself. In order for the Law of conservation of momentum to be conserved, something must exist which conserves it. That something could very well be God.
The laws of nature are man-made descriptions of the observations of reality. There is no law giver, your gobbledygook notwithstanding.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.