Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2025, 8:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
#79
RE: The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
Obviously you have misunderstood the significance of the Great Pyramids, godschild. They are amazing and magnificent. However, the reason that they are such is not because we can't recreate them because the Egyptians were more advanced than we are. They are amazing because building such a monument was such a massive undertaking at the time and they did so with precision that must have been painstaking for them to have lasted so long. Such precision was not easy to come by with the tools they had at hand.

Engineers of today could build the pyramids without breaking a sweat, literally. They could sit in air-conditioned equipment and build an exact fucking replica of it. (I should say close to an exact replica. They could build an exact replica, but then they'd have to dissect them) Before you ask for a source, I will tell you that I know this because I have read about the pyramids extensively. How could scholars and scientists explain the dimensions and building materials of the pyramids with any kind of authority, if they don't understand how to build them? That's like saying, I can draw you a blueprint of a house and tell you exactly what you would need to build it, but I have no idea how to build it.

Min's reference to the aqueducts is an example of well-placed pride. What function did the pyramids serve, other than to waste a lot of time and effort and give us something to gawk at? In fact, the sort of pride that built the pyramids was foolish. The aqueducts served a purpose. I'll give you a shiny penny if you can tell me why the aqueducts were more important than the pyramids, godschild.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Bible, what's literal and what's not? - by Shell B - July 7, 2010 at 10:39 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jerry Falwell Jnr "not a christian" and wanted to prove himself to not be like Snr Pat Mustard 18 3401 November 1, 2022 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 55781 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Wanted: Christians who reject the supernatural and a literal afterlife. Whateverist 48 16059 October 20, 2017 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  How does "Science prove that the miracles of the Bible did not happen" ? Emzap 62 15461 November 4, 2016 at 2:05 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Mary is not a virgin by the Bible accounts Fake Messiah 26 5238 September 30, 2016 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  What the Bible Does NOT Say About Premarital Sex Rhondazvous 30 8067 January 25, 2016 at 2:40 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Illinois bible colleges: "We shouldn't have to follow state standards because bible!" Esquilax 34 9300 January 23, 2015 at 12:29 pm
Last Post: Spooky
  Trust the Bible not Science Dolorian 34 9718 October 25, 2014 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  The Bible: not a page turner! sven 34 7379 April 7, 2014 at 7:26 am
Last Post: truthBtold
  The Bible is the claim, not the evidence Bad Writer 299 104133 February 27, 2014 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Esquilax



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)