Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false

[Esquilax]

The problem with Stimbo's claim is he assumes God is absent in every element of the experiment and then concludes God is absent in every element of the experiment. I challenge his question begging by asking how it is he knows God is not involved with conserving the laws of nature(which is an element of the experiment).

Without any evidence that god is intervening, what reason would we ever have to think that he is?

This is the problem with you: you're still trying to pretend that a complete, total lack of evidence is not literally what would be the case if the variable in question was not present.