Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false

[Cyberman]

The problem with Stimbo's claim is he assumes God is absent in every element of the experiment and then concludes God is absent in every element of the experiment. I challenge his question begging by asking how it is he knows God is not involved with conserving the laws of nature(which is an element of the experiment).

Except no I didn't nor don't need to assume that and fuck you for telling me what I think. I took the M/U data as presented at face value and saw no reason to attribute any god to the conclusion where the system as simulated was perfectly capable of achieving the postulated results all by itself. What you're doing is the equivalent of showing me a piece of toast with an apparent face on it and telling me it's a miracle. All I am doing is taking the work of those who have actually examined this experimentally and observing that adding a god's hand to the picture not only isn't helpful, it's actually anathema to productive research and a scientific dead end, since assuming the god answer tells us nothing about how it happened.

I don't have to deny any physical laws nor eliminate all possible god options merely to point out that the things under experimental observation happened apparently all by themselves. You want to squeeze a god in there, be my guest.