RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 7:43 pm
(November 3, 2014 at 4:37 pm)Heywood Wrote:(November 3, 2014 at 1:18 pm)Chas Wrote: Do we also have to prove no leprechaun involvement? Sprite involvement? Pixie involvement?
No, Heywood, that is not the way it works.
The way it works is you make a claim and then the burden of proof is on you to support that claim. For some reason you think atheists are immune to having a burden of proof....but they are not. Stimbo made a claim and the argument above shows he did not satisfy the burden of proof of substantiating his claim.
No, BlowJob, you are inserting an unnecessary factor where there is no need. That's not the way scientific inquiry works.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.