RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 4, 2014 at 7:59 am
"Despite considerable experimental and theoretical effort, no compelling scenarios currently exist for the origin of replication and translation, the key processes that together comprise the core of biological systems and the apparent pre-requisite of biological evolution. The RNA World concept might offer the best chance for the resolution of this conundrum but so far cannot adequately account for the emergence of an efficient RNA replicase or the translation system. The MWO (Ed.: "many worlds in one"[118]) version of the cosmological model of eternal inflation could suggest a way out of this conundrum because, in an infinite multiverse with a finite number of distinct macroscopic histories (each repeated an infinite number of times), emergence of even highly complex systems by chance is not just possible but inevitable."
Eugene Koonin, computational biologist
So is he saying that we'd have to believe in infinite universes in order to substantiate abiogenesis? Or did I misinterpret that?
Eugene Koonin, computational biologist
So is he saying that we'd have to believe in infinite universes in order to substantiate abiogenesis? Or did I misinterpret that?
"My life has taught me that true spiritual insight can come about only through direct experience, the way a severe burn can be attained only by putting your hand in the fire. Faith is nothing more than a watered-down attempt to accept someone else's insight as your own." -Damien Echols
