RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 4, 2014 at 4:03 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2014 at 4:04 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 4, 2014 at 2:06 pm)Heywood Wrote: Parker Tan made a prediction. He predicted if God exists then we should see copious amounts of energy radiated from that being(which is omnipresent so the radiation would be everywhere).
I then asked him if the newly discovered Dark Energy satisfied his prediction.
He then promptly tried to change the subject.
No, I mocked your concept of god, considering that it doesn't comport with the Biblical god of majesty and glory, but is rather a skulking, fearful little thing hiding in the hypothetical equations of mortals. The thought of worshipping such a pissant is repugnant, and you should be better than that.
Also, I notice that you're trying to impute omnipresence to your god. On what are you basing that claim? First, you should show that he exists; then you may hold court about his qualities.
(November 4, 2014 at 2:06 pm)Heywood Wrote: I won't let him wiggly out of it so easily and you should not help him wiggle out of it either. Let the discussion take its course and we will all see were it leads.
The reason why dark energy is unlikely to be a sign of your god is because the radiation emitted by acts of creation and destruction isn't a hypothetical energy posited to balance mathematical equations, but is actual energy visible in the Universe -- like the light radiated from the Sun when helium is created.
You know, real.
I'm surprised someone of your stunning intellect and obviously extensive education had no idea that dark energy is entirely hypothetical, with no expression in reality whatsoever.
Come to think of it, maybe it is your little god-thingy ... it sure fits the description.
