Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 1, 2025, 7:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Questions about Time, Distance, and Relativity
#16
RE: Questions about Time, Distance, and Relativity
(November 10, 2014 at 11:39 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Now that I'm onto A Universe From Nothing by Lawrence Krauss, two additional questions:
1. Does the following question make sense?
I'm guessing the question is "does a universe from nothing makes sense?"

I haven't read Krauss's book, so I don't know exactly his argument. However, there two observations that make me think it is possible.

The first is general relativity's basic principle that mass distorts spacetime. Is the opposite true that distorted spacetime makes mass? If it is, then fluctuations in spacetime creates mass.

Second, we know that particles and their exact opposite pop out of quantum vacuum and disappear, i.e. virtual particles. Some will argue that the quantum vacuum is something, but I don't buy their arguments. To make the quantum vacuum into something is to bring another aether theory. In my opinion, these virtual particles demonstrate the instability of nothing. So a particle and it's exact opposite can pop into existence and before the pop back into nothing one of the particles decays into 3 particles. So the original particles can't recombine back to get nothing. Tada, something from nothing.

I will admit that my ideas still have some holes in them. And the first and second reasons have some contradictory statements. I haven't yet spend too much time refining them.

Quote:2. How do physicists know that the "hot" and "cold" spots in the cosmic microwave background radiation are sub-Planck length quantum fluctuations magnified by inflation if such ultra-microscopic regions of empty space are far beyond the technological limits of observation?

First, the maximum starting size of the universe is a Planck length because the uncertainty principle (what effectly allows for the existence of virtual particles) allows gravity poping into existence.

Second, the Planck length is by no means the smallest unit of distance. The Planck length is the smallest distance that can be measured. The expansion of the universe is not a measurement.

So the starting size of the universe being a Planck length and then expanded to something much bigger is just magnifing what was going on inside.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Questions about Time, Distance, and Relativity - by Surgenator - November 10, 2014 at 1:56 pm
RE: Questions about Time, Distance, and Relativity - by Alex K - November 11, 2014 at 10:18 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Simple Demonstration of Space/Time Relativity Rhondazvous 14 3742 August 26, 2019 at 10:38 pm
Last Post: Vince
  A citizen scientist validates General Relativity. Jehanne 24 4470 March 3, 2018 at 10:16 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Space-Time: The Bopdie Twins: If Space is Expanding Isn't Time Expandin Too? Rhondazvous 14 2348 August 2, 2017 at 8:06 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Lee Smolin's "Time Reborn" and the Andromeda Paradox Gemini 17 5990 August 15, 2016 at 10:43 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Kosh 5 2018 March 22, 2016 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Kosh
  Happy General Relativity Centennial Alex K 8 2350 November 25, 2015 at 6:16 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Spooky Action at a Distance logicalreason 2 890 August 11, 2014 at 5:44 am
Last Post: LivingNumbers6.626
  Time and the Speed of Light Mudhammam 43 9200 April 30, 2014 at 11:06 am
Last Post: little_monkey
  The Essential General Relativity little_monkey 6 1934 January 23, 2014 at 12:48 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Spooky Action at a Distance and Bell's Theorem Revisited little_monkey 10 3297 May 14, 2013 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Aractus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)