(November 18, 2014 at 8:32 pm)snowtracks Wrote:(November 17, 2014 at 6:21 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: In my layperson opinion, there's no functional difference between "A God" and an effect observed and ascribed particular characteristics.scenarios: 1. cell has a complete membrane with nothing in it. 2. all the cell parts with no membrane. Parts as: nucleus, protoplasm (dna material), vacuoles, etc. 3. Fully functional cell - naturalism posit that this happened but is unexplained.
The fundamental disconnect seems to be that those systems which function survive, and those that don't die out.
A creationist anthropomorphizes this process into an existing being more intelligent than they can fathom; whose eternal nature implies the same output effect as a blind process rewriting code until something sticks, so to speak.
There's no functional difference, so I don't see where the disagreement lies.
#2 - cell wouldn’t last a nanosecond without a membrane. Maybe the nucleus directed it’s construction faster then that to save the day.
let me prove human evolution with skin color. Climate <- Climate plays a role a very large role on how a persons skin color is going to be back thousands to millions of years ago with ancient man. Darker skin hey you lived in a area with lots of sun and terrible heat. Lighter skin color you live in a area with 4 seasons. moderately or somewhat dark colored you have terrible summers and another or so few seasons.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>