RE: Obamacare written to deceive the public.
November 19, 2014 at 11:31 am
(This post was last modified: November 19, 2014 at 11:33 am by Heywood.)
(November 19, 2014 at 12:50 am)Surgenator Wrote: You're as much of an independent as Bill O'Reilly.
Just because you don't agree with every policy in the democratic or republican party doesn't mean you lean more to one party than another. From your post and comments, we know exactly which way you lean.
I think of myself as a right winger on many issues and pretty much have always voted right because I will always vote against pro-abortion candidates.
But if I posted my views on a right wing forum....I'd be called a communist or socialist.
(November 19, 2014 at 1:12 am)DeistPaladin Wrote:(November 19, 2014 at 1:06 am)Aractus Wrote: Yep, imagine if you will you're on trial. It's your right to be tried by a jury of your peers and there are 12 jurors. At the end of the trial the jury leaves the court room and only 4 jurors return to deliver a verdict - the other 8 decided they didn't want to vote. How would that make you feel?
That only the most fanatical of the four are likely left. Fanatics don't see things from different perspectives and so have a limited understanding of the things they are so passionate about. Thus my jury is not likely to have a nuanced position or full understanding of what they're going to rule on.
Your analogy fits with my experience. When few people vote, the more fanatical are the ones who disproportionately show up and the effect becomes more apparent in our government.
Watching you guys rationalize why you lost the election is comical.
You lost cause you're doing a shitty job of governance.