(November 19, 2014 at 11:45 am)Fortruth Wrote: Stimbo: Which further proves my point. It is there but according to you and your likes it is not and never will be "compelling". Never mind the evolution theory is not being compelling to the Christians. So it will be a bit hard to continue discussions if you keep coming with arguments that "there are no evidences..."
Me and my likes? My likes? Congratulations; I've had exactly two exchanges with you and now I officially don't like you.
You don't get to tell me what I will find compelling as evidence, nor do you get to generalise an entire demographic based on that. I have never, ever, said I can never accept evidence; neither have I ever said "there are no evidences" (shit grammar notwithstanding). The plain, unvarnished fact is that such evidence that has been presented has consisted of confirmation bias, historical misdirections, scientific distortions, pseudo-philosophical masturbation, logical gymnastics, known and admitted fraud, personal experiences, strawmen, special pleading, quotemining, appeals to consequences and emotion, threats of damnation, and I could go on but I'll run out of internet. Exhibit A is the "evolution theory not being compelling to xtians" tu quoque/red herring hybrid you crapped out without even realising. You'd think that any god worthy of the title could make its basic existence known, or at least knowable, without all the smoke and mirors.
Don't like that I discount your evidence? Tough - get better evidence. Or get out of my face.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
