Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 10:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
#30
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
Petty objections? That's the exact point at which, if this was a video or a live congregation, a preacher would try to fit the entire bible. "These sources show that a man named Jesus of Nazareth, our lord and savior, the son of GOD, who found it in his ever loving heart to sacrificed himself to save us from an eternity of damnation at the hands of Sataaaaaan himself, a man sent by God to show us the path to the light, to the glory of God Almighty!....existed", in hopes that by the time the verbal masturbation is over, the flock will have forgotten the point all together. When really they say "Jesus" or "Christians". This isn't a petty objection, because its not an objection at all. I was pointing it out for fellow readers who may come along and be misled by the tactic of diverting attention from what the sources actually say, while ascribing much more information to them than is actually there.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:

"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."

For context, this is the previous verse:

"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 10:47 pm
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Exian - December 12, 2014 at 12:34 am
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 12:01 am
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 3:45 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Psalm 110 is about the Israelite king, not Jesus Christ GrandizerII 0 116 July 12, 2025 at 11:38 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 7516 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 9063 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 11212 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 5260 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 5590 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 2240 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 4937 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 4267 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 26460 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)