MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Zen Badger]

To your first, we have eye witness accounts of Van Buren, but none of Jesus, so you fail there.

We have eyewitness accounts of Jesus too..Paul claimed to not only see the Resurrected Jesus, but he meet with the original disciples who WERE eyewitnesses. But that doesn't count, does it...well, neither does the Van Buren accounts. I am not playing the double standard game.

For your second one, Tacticus mentions a michevious superstition therefore the resurrection?!?! Fuck, you really are grasping at straws now laddie.

Yeah, I can totally see why the story of a man being crucified and rising from the dead would be seen as a mischievous superstition to a unbeliever. In fact, Tacitus feels the same way that most of you people on here feel.

And lastly, this only attests to people's gullibility, nothing else.
Now if Christianity had appeared simultaneously at different places around the world you would have a case.

If you move the goal posts back any further I might not be able to see it at all. Simultaneously at difference places around the world? You sound like a damn fool

Well, right now, it is in all places around the world...simultaneously...over 2 billion followers...starting from one wise guy and 12 of his idiot followers....

Quoting the bible(Paul) to support the bible will get you nowhere lad, so don't bother.

The term "Michevious superstition"is not evidence of the resurrection. You'll have to much better than that.

Don't you believe that your omnipotent god is capable of starting Christianity in different places at the same time? Are you some sort of doubter? Shame on you.

And lastly, the success of Christianity owes more to the quantity of its violence and very little to the quality of its truth.