RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 22, 2014 at 1:04 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2014 at 1:10 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(November 22, 2014 at 10:57 am)His_Majesty Wrote:
Despite my continual requests for you stop being stupid you insist on being just that.
You can attempt to use fallacious equivocation to make your non-descript god-child-man-ghost more real, but when we bracket in the fact that abiogensis is a theoretical paradigm based on observations that have been made in the reality we exist in ('life' didn't exist, now it does), we can see that equating that to a magical jew coming back from the dead (which is demonstrably impossible using the exact same standard) is fucking ridiculous.
Defend your assertion. What evidence do you have that this Jésus character came back to life, or was even killed in the first place?