RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 23, 2014 at 11:29 am
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2014 at 11:33 am by Cyberman.)
(November 23, 2014 at 9:41 am)His_Majesty Wrote: I mention one tiny paragraph at which he mentions Jesus, and you bring up damn near his entire life's work?
No, I provided the paragraphs immediately preceding and following the one tiny paragraph you want to pretend is all the man wrote. It's called context, cully.
A while back I tried a similar exercise. I gave the whole of that chapter minus the TF, then invited people to work out purely from the flow of the text - no preconceptions - where the TF passage ought to fit. I don't recall anyone taking up that gauntlet.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
