Obamacare written to deceive the public.

[Brian37]

I'm sure barack would be happier governing your country than he is ruining ours.

Excuse me?

Which party lied us into the ruinous quagmire in Iraq, a disaster that is still paying dividends?

Which party crashed our economy in 2008?

Which party has managed to get nothing done on purpose since taking control of the House?

Which party shut down the government costing our economy some $24 billion in damages?

Which party nearly destroyed the country in Oct 2013 when they threatened to deliberately default on our debt in an act of political extortion? There was a big faction in the GOP that was crazy enough to do it, too. My jackass Senator Rand Paul was among those who voted at the 11th hour to press the button and have everything go up in an economic mushroom cloud.

"Give us what we want or Uncle Sam here gets a bullet in the head!"

The Republicans have done more damage to America than Osama Bin Laden could have ever dreamed of.

AGAIN lets take a long term approach as to WHY flawed perceptions happened. Because people see what they want to see.

The kneejerk affect of flawed perceptions is what cause a revolution to go to a more open society to a closed society or a more closed society to a more open society. The real reason you cannot blindly accept any blanket economic solution is that we are missing what is really going on. A shift of wealth from one part of a society to another part of society.

The cause of the Russian revolution was a lack of resources. Stalin played off a populist attitude and simply shifted class wealth to party wealth. Our oligarchy now is no different. In this case instead of one party monopolizing government, you have one class monopolizing government. But in both cases you still have wealth driving both.

So it is not a matter of riding society of wealth, it is a matter of enforcing anti monopolies by ANY aspect of society. Neither one political party, or one religion, or one class, or one economic view should have any right to a monopoly.

---

Numbers, please?

I cited my claim. Just because you decided to edit out my citation doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

You "my way or the highway and if someone competes with me i am going to accuse them of what I am doing in reality". Same mentality a bully has, when they get challenged they suddenly play victim.

NOW again, the part you keep missing is that we are NOT going to argue that your claim does not exist. Just like conspiracy crap, what we are doubting is your interpretation of the data. What we are doubting is your perception of what you think works.

Wealth does do good things and no one should argue that. What we are arguing is that CURRENTLY far too much of that class lives in a bubble. I do not want the private sector to go away, I do want wealth to do things differently.

Again, if your numbers worked like you would want to claim, there would be no bitching. In evolution in other primates we see more calm and more cooperation, WHEN the individuals overall are balanced and the inequity is not lopsided to a unsustainable degree. No one should live in a utopia thinking no inequity should happen. But your mentality is a competition to the bottom, healthy competition raises everyone.

When we talk about equality, we are not talking about no inequity at all. When we talk about equality, we are talking about not making your class the absolute patent holder of all human morality.

There is room for everyone, but it will work better for everyone and more people if we stop repeating 30 years of allowing one class a monopoly of how our laws work.