(November 24, 2014 at 6:36 pm)abaris Wrote: But as much as I hate it, he got the basics right. Most historians actually do believe it to be a historical figure or collection thereoff.
So? I frankly couldn't care less what they believe, I care about *why* they believe it.
Historians aren't trying to sell us a supernatural bill of goods, this joker is. I'll undermine his argument wherever it's weak - and it's weak down to it's very foundation.
(November 24, 2014 at 6:36 pm)abaris Wrote: The point is, there's no record of anything other than some troublemaker wandering the land.
There's not even any credible record of that.
