MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[His_Majesty]

Hehehe, I wouldn't use Bart E. either....

But even taking these into account, there is not a single mythicist who teaches New Testament or Early Christianity or even Classics at any accredited institution of higher learning in the Western world. And it is no wonder why. These views are so extreme and so unconvincing to 99.99 percent of the real experts that anyone holding them is as likely to get a teaching job in an established department of religion as a six-day creationist is likely to land on in a bona fide department of biology.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bart-d-ehr...49544.html

Yeah, Bart...you might be on to something...now turn that statement inward....

HM...tell us, please, -why- the evidence suggests this, and what evidence it is that suggests this? You don't have to speak volumes...a couple of sentences will be sufficient.

I couldn't make out what your question is, exactly...BUT, lets just remove all doubt...

Here is a video of Bart Ehrman himself stating what he, as a non-Christian, believe about the historical Jesus...

And the good thing about this video is the fact that the question is asked and answered IMMEDIATELY...right when the video begins to play, he dives right into it....quite the claim for a non-Christian, I think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdqJyk-dtLs