(November 24, 2014 at 6:51 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 24, 2014 at 6:44 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: So? I frankly couldn't care less what they believe, I care about *why* they believe it.
Historians aren't trying to sell us a supernatural bill of goods, this joker is. I'll undermine his argument wherever it's weak - and it's weak down to it's very foundation.
Ok well how about this..you do your own research to figure out why...but the fact of the matter is, they do.
It's not my argument. The burden is yours if you're seeking to convince anyone.
Transparent attempt to shift the burden of proof noted, by the way.
(November 24, 2014 at 6:51 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 24, 2014 at 6:44 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: There's not even any credible record of that.
Obviously..."evidences" are subjective...but again, the record is credible enough for even non-Christians to believe it.
How so? Because they believe it, QED?
You're back to an implicit appeal to authority and popularity now.
This isn't going to fly, and I sure as hell wouldn't allow such sloppy logic to pass in part 2, so I fail to see why I should here.