MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[His_Majesty]

Are you really this stupid?

Damn the ad hominems, I asked you a freakin' question...how do you know that George Washington was the first President of the U.S....you cannot begin to answer that question without basing it off on what you were told.

So answer the question......how do you know that George Washington was the first President of the U.S??

You don't even have that (it is, in fact one of the questions we seek to answer here), and given that it's one element of what you're trying to prove, it's absolutely question begging to assert it here.

Actually we do...we have the book of Acts, which Jospehus corroborates by saying that followers of Christ were called "Christians" by the population.

Keep the feeble objections coming.

But please, do continue as if your entire argument isn't fallacious.

So you are willing to think that the vast majority of historians are fallacious? Okey dokey.

---

Dude, you have to look at the entire freakin' context.

If you recognise that, why did your wheels spin when I tried to get you to do it with the TF passage in Josephus? Which double standard are we flying with here?

I repeat: I'd like to see the passage myself. (Something like that)