RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 25, 2014 at 1:56 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm by Cyberman.)
But you haven't been demonstrating that; merely asserting it. I and others here have been leadiing you by the hand, step by step, through the reasons why your evidence isn't actually evidence for what you're claiming it is. Clearly it's not all that compelling, or there'd be more historians who would accept it. I'm not a historian, but I am a reasonable man. I'll accept a good reason. I'll accept a bad reason. I'll accept any damn reason at all, only at least meet me halfway and give me something to get my teeth into.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
