(November 25, 2014 at 4:58 am)Zen Badger Wrote: HM, there is one thing you probably need to be aware of.
Whilst your "proofs" maybe satisfactory to you, they are not sufficient for us.
You need to present much better evidence than you have been.
Everything you have presented so far has been rejected in detail.
And for you to continue to rant that we should accept it makes you to appear as nothing more than some petulant child having a tantrum.
Just a thought.
Here is just a thought, too. The vast majority of historians, some who aren't friendly to Christianity at all, is willing to accept the sources that I provided as historical evidence that Jesus the man existed...the vast majority, and there are many out there.
The fact that this small group on this forum thinks otherwise is no problem...the fact that Jesus existed is an issue that most historical skeptics regarding Christianity and Christians can actually agree on...if you are not on board...that is your issue.
