(November 25, 2014 at 2:45 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Here's the thing, though. We are not dealing with "the vast majority of historians", we're dealing with you and your assertions of a "vast majority". The two or three names you've cited have been examined and found sorely wanting, for reasons that have been explained to you at length. These people are not unknown to many of us and their 'work' dissected many times over the years - peer review, if you like.
It's rather like 1 Corinthians 15:6. One single reference to "five hundred brethren" and apologists such as Josh McDowell turn that into "an amazing 50 hours of firsthand testimony".
The problem is that His_Majesty seems unable to distinguish between "things His_Majesty says," and "absolute factual truth." To him, the mere fact that he made the claim is also the evidence that supports it; that's why we can go through approximately fifty billion pages of asking him for evidence to support his views on evolution, get none, and still end up with a "boy, I really beat you guys!" statement from the guy.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
