RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 25, 2014 at 7:46 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 7:56 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 25, 2014 at 2:04 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: The vast majority of historians, some who aren't friendly to Christianity at all, is willing to accept the sources that I provided as historical evidence that Jesus the man existed...the vast majority, and there are many out there.
I'm going to ask you again for your source for this claim. Who asked what question of which historians to determine that "the vast majority" of them accept the historicity of Christ?
Link up, or shut up.
(November 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Well yeah...but the same can be said for any historical figure, that he/she may or may not have really existed. You don't know what is an actual fact or what is actually fiction in history...all you can do is go by what you were told, by people that may or may not have been trying to push an agenda...the same thing you would probably accuse Christians of doing.
In other words, you're not just scientifically illiterate, you're historically uneducated as well.
There's a methodology to historical investigation that you clearly are unacquainted with.
