RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 25, 2014 at 8:13 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 8:14 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 25, 2014 at 3:42 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 25, 2014 at 11:59 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: [Citation needed]
I want to know, who polled them, how large was the sample size, where it was located, exactly what questions were asked, and other such data, before I accept that claim, anyway.
Four out of five dentists prefer Trident, too ... if you ask the right dentists the right questions.
Citation needed?Check out the references in the wiki article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity...note-fox-6 in the wiki article.
And I already gave the video where agnostic Bart Ehrman confirmed this...he is an actual historian that is active in the field and has spent over 30 years in the field, running across many historians in the field over those years..and practically all of them accept Jesus as a historical figure.
It isn't as if Bart has anything to gain from this "common knowledge" in the field of history...he isn't even a Christian...but it is what it is...almost all agree that Jesus of Nazareth existed.
You cannot link to a study demonstrating your claim?
Color me shocked.
Linking to an unlinked wiki credit is not a citation, kid. You need to get with the program. Link to a study demonstrating your claim.
As for citing Ehrman, your sample size is too small. Lrn2Statistic, dipshit.
