(November 25, 2014 at 11:10 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Great, now we have something to work with. I know you think it's funny that you have to be dragged over burning coals just to supply supporting evidence and citations for your assertions, but see how much time we've wasted just on this. Get a little integrity, why don't you.
That's the typical tactic. It usually takes at least seven posts of "...but what's the evidence that convinces these scholars?" before they answer.
This is why I'm a Jesus Mooter. It's not because I've been impressed by the evidence but that I'm worn down by the tactics of the "historists". It's a predictable formula. The evidence is paper thin so they pad the debate with lots of ad hominems, appeals to authority and other run-arounds.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
