(November 25, 2014 at 7:46 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I'm going to ask you again for your source for this claim. Who asked what question of which historians to determine that "the vast majority" of them accept the historicity of Christ?
Link up, or shut up.
I already provided that info...if you can't keep up with the thread, either try harder, or tough shit.
(November 25, 2014 at 7:46 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: In other words, you're not just scientifically illiterate, you're historically uneducated as well.
Science haven't been able to prove abiogenesis...fact....and the vast majority of all historians believe in the historical Jesus...fact.
Do a google search and educate yourself on both history, and the incompotence of science in certain areas.
(November 25, 2014 at 7:46 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: There's a methodology to historical investigation that you clearly are unacquainted with.
Well, apparently you are too...since you are apparently ignorant of the historical concensus regarding Jesus of Nazareth, otherwise you wouldn't be asking me these dumb ass questions.
Navigate through the pages and look at my references, or do your own research, and come back and rejoin the conversation when your knowledge level increases.
