RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 28, 2014 at 6:45 pm
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2014 at 6:51 pm by Smaug.)
Quote:Just bitter atheist bully.
You don't call people bullies when you're breaking simple conduct rules on their territory.
The notion that all non-religious and atheistic people are at large snarky and bitter is a product of self-deception by those who can't imagine happy life without religion (here I must note that I myself don't put deists and agnostics into religious category, for me they don't principally differ from atheists). In reality the problem is that more religious people tend to over-react when they see their sacred texts and dogmas discussed and addressed in a 'blasphemous' and 'improper' ways. Since dogmatic arguements in religion are reduced to faith pretty rapidly (no matter how complex the apologetics may look) steadfast believers are left stranded and either pull off out of the discussion or refrain to improper arguements. Of course there are accounts of backslash against zealous believers but that isn't a problem of non-religious in most cases. And if you want to know why non-religious like to discuss religion so much than the answer is trivial: although it's not Middle Ages now religion still heavily affects the world and may affect everyone's life so for both philosophical and practical reasons it's good to have a detailed knowledge and position regarding religion.
