RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 29, 2014 at 1:23 am
(This post was last modified: November 29, 2014 at 1:27 am by DeistPaladin.)
(November 29, 2014 at 12:55 am)His_Majesty Wrote: "...We have more evidence for Jesus than we have for almost anybody from his time period."
Prof Bart Ehrman, University of North Carolina
WOW!
Bart Ehrman actually said that? Well, I supposed it depends what you mean by "almost anybody". How many historical characters are allowed for with that "almost" fudge factor?
Clearly, he really isn't a historian. Or he's being dishonest.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
