I'm sorry, I only read the first six pages before hrm started out-and-out lieing before skipping here to see him being ridiculously stupid. So I am browsing and not seeing any argument or evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. Just him saying "I provided good evidence he existed!" while everyone else says no he didn't.
Let me just state I actually do think there was a historical person at the beginning of the cult which became Christianity. There were several such figures who started cults in the area at the time. I think that Paul used one of these as the basis for what we today call Christianity.
I would like to move past the "Jesus existed" part and come to the evidence that exists for the resurrection. If it has already been presented I apologize, but it doesn't look like it.
Let me just state I actually do think there was a historical person at the beginning of the cult which became Christianity. There were several such figures who started cults in the area at the time. I think that Paul used one of these as the basis for what we today call Christianity.
I would like to move past the "Jesus existed" part and come to the evidence that exists for the resurrection. If it has already been presented I apologize, but it doesn't look like it.
